Myth Vs facts

  • Home
  • Myth Vs facts Regarding Microbial Culture


Myth Vs Facts Regarding Microbial Culture

Separating Fact from Fiction: Microbial Cultures' Role in Effective Wastewater Treatment


Myth: Using any microbial product will improve treatment.

Fact: Different wastewater treatment plants have specific needs, and the selection of microbial cultures should be based on the characteristics of the wastewater being treated. Not all microbial products are suitable for every situation.

Myth: Microbes can completely eliminate the need for other treatment processes.

Fact: Biological treatment is a vital component, but it is often used in conjunction with other physical and chemical processes to achieve comprehensive wastewater treatment. Relying solely on microbes may not be sufficient for certain contaminants.

Myth: Once microbes are introduced, they can survive and thrive indefinitely.

Fact: Microbial populations can be sensitive to changes in environmental conditions, including pH, temperature, and the composition of the wastewater. Regular monitoring and maintenance are necessary to ensure the health and effectiveness of the microbial culture.

Myth: Microbial cultures eliminate all pathogens in wastewater.

Fact: While microbial activity can reduce pathogen levels, it may not eliminate all of them. Additional disinfection processes are often required to ensure the removal of harmful pathogens.

Myth: Once a microbial culture is introduced, there is no need for monitoring or adjustments.

Fact: Wastewater treatment systems require ongoing monitoring and adjustments to adapt to changes in influent characteristics, weather conditions, and other factors. Neglecting regular checks can lead to system inefficiencies.

Myth: All microbial cultures are environmentally friendly and safe.

Fact: Some microbial products may contain genetically modified organisms or chemicals that could have unintended environmental consequences. It's essential to choose microbial cultures that are safe, non-toxic, and have been thoroughly tested.

Myth: One Bioculture can handle all types of industrial wastewater equally well.

Fact: Different industries produce wastewater with varying compositions and contaminants. The suitability of a specific microbial culture depends on the nature of the pollutants present. Tailoring the treatment approach to the specific industrial effluent is crucial.

Myth: All microbial products are equally effective in different climates and conditions.

Fact: The performance of microbial cultures can be influenced by environmental factors such as temperature and humidity. Choosing cultures that are suitable for the local climate is essential for optimal performance.

Myth: Microbial cultures can instantly improve water quality.

Fact: Wastewater treatment processes take time, and improvements in water quality are not instantaneous. Patience is required as microbial cultures gradually break down organic matter and pollutants.

Myth: Microbial cultures can completely eliminate the need for sludge management.

Fact: While microbial activity can reduce sludge production, it typically does not eliminate the need for sludge management practices. Regular removal and treatment of sludge are often necessary components of wastewater treatment.

Myth: Once a microbial culture is established, it will adapt to any changes automatically.

Fact: While microbial communities can adapt to some changes, sudden or drastic alterations in wastewater characteristics can impact their effectiveness. Regular monitoring and, if necessary, adjustments are essential for stable and efficient treatment.

Myth: Microbial cultures can completely eliminate the need for maintenance and system checks.

Fact: Regular maintenance, monitoring, and system checks are essential for the proper functioning of a wastewater treatment plant. While microbial cultures contribute to the treatment process, neglecting routine maintenance can lead to operational issues.

Myth: The "ubiquity principle" implies that organisms thrive universally over time.

Facts: Contrary to this notion, real-world data shows otherwise, particularly in the short term. Wastewater systems depend on a dynamic ecosystem that is susceptible to environmental changes. For example, during cold weather, crucial microbes like ammonia oxidizers may dwindle, affecting system functionality. Although these microbes may gradually replenish, the process is sluggish due to limited reintroduction from air and influent water. This underscores the divergence between theoretical expectations and the practical complexities of wastewater management.

Myth: Microbial products are expensive to use.

Facts: Contrary to popular belief, in the majority of cases where an operating problem arises in an activated sludge plant (such as poor settling sludge, lack of ammonia oxidation, foaming, or erratic BOD removal rates), resolving the issue through physical means, like adding equipment or chemical products (oxidizing agents, polyelectrolytes, etc.), is far more costly than bioaugmentation. This has been proven time and time again. While there are limitations on the conditions under which microbial additives can thrive and the extent to which desired results can be achieved, in most instances, bioaugmentation proves to be the more cost-effective solution.

Myth: A small improvement in my discharge water quality is not worth the price of the microbial additive.

Facts: This statement is unequivocally false. Even plants operating at 90% removal rates or better may not meet regulatory compliance standards. Many facilities expend significant resources on chemical products to meet compliance requirements. Physical modifications to achieve minor increases in removal rates in secondary treatment plants are typically exorbitant, often pushing effluent water quality into tertiary treatment territory. Consider a scenario where a plant has an influent fat, oil, and grease (FOG) concentration of 30 mg/l, with an effluent limit of 5 mg/l—this level allows for water reuse in irrigation. If the plant discharges at 6 mg/l FOG (achieving an 80% removal rate), it violates its permit and risks fines. To meet the 5 mg/l limit, removal must increase to 83% or higher—a modest improvement, yet sufficient to avoid violations. Therefore, a microbial additive capable of providing such a minor enhancement would only need to be priced lower than the potential fine to be considered cost-effective. In nearly every instance, the expense of achieving FOG limits through bioaugmentation of indigenous biomass is significantly lower than the cost of capital improvements required to achieve compliance.

Myths: BioReme cannot reduce the TSS

Facts: BioReme can help to reduce Total Suspended Solids (TSS) through various mechanisms:

  • Enhanced Biological Activity: BioReme will enhance the biological activity within the treatment system. The microbes in BioReme can efficiently degrade organic matter and break down suspended solids, reducing TSS levels in the wastewater.
  • Increased Settling Rates: Certain microbial strains present in BioReme have the ability to produce extracellular polymeric substances (EPS), which help in forming flocs and aggregating suspended solids. This facilitates faster settling of solids in sedimentation tanks, leading to improved TSS removal efficiency.
  • Improved Floc Formation: Some specific microbial strains present in Bioreme can promote the formation of larger, denser flocs. These well-formed flocs are more easily captured during the sedimentation process, resulting in reduced TSS in the effluent.
  • Enhanced Nutrient Removal: Some microbial species introduced in BioReme have the capability to uptake nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus, which are often associated with suspended solids. By promoting the removal of these nutrients, bioaugmentation indirectly contributes to TSS reduction.
  • Resilience to Upsets: Microbial communities in Bioreme tend to be more resilient to fluctuations and upsets in the treatment system. This resilience helps maintain consistent treatment performance, ensuring effective TSS removal even during challenging operational conditions.

Overall, BioReme offers a sustainable and cost-effective approach to improving TSS removal in WWTPs by harnessing the natural abilities of specific microbial strains to enhance treatment processes.

Myths: To introduce BioReme into the system, the plant must undergo recommissioning.

Facts: The process of bioaugmentation introduces specially selected and robust bacterial strains into the wastewater treatment environment. These strong bacteria possess enhanced metabolic capabilities, allowing them to outcompete weaker strains for available resources. As the robust bacteria thrive and efficiently consume organic matter and nutrients present in the wastewater, they create an environment that is less favourable for the growth and survival of weaker bacterial species. This competitive advantage enables the strong bacteria to rapidly multiply and dominate the microbial community within the treatment system. Over time, the continuous presence and activity of the robust bacteria lead to a depletion of essential resources, such as organic carbon and nitrogen compounds, which are essential for the growth and survival of weaker bacteria. As a result, the weaker bacterial strains are unable to sustain themselves in the increasingly competitive environment and gradually die off due to resource scarcity and competition from the stronger strains. Through this natural process of competition and selection, bioaugmentation effectively promotes the dominance of strong bacterial populations, which contribute to enhanced treatment efficiency and improved wastewater quality. This selective advantage ensures that the treatment system remains optimized for the desired microbial activity, ultimately leading to more efficient organic matter degradation and nutrient removal.

Myth: Nutrient requirements for aerobic and anaerobic systems are the same.

Facts: In reality, the nutrient requirements for aerobic and anaerobic systems differ significantly due to variations in microbial metabolism and metabolic pathways. In aerobic systems, where oxygen is present, the nutrient requirements are typically higher, with a recommended ratio of around 100:5:1 or higher. On the other hand, anaerobic systems, which operate in the absence of oxygen, have lower nutrient requirements, with a recommended ratio of around 100:3:1 or lower. These differences in nutrient requirements reflect the distinct microbial communities and metabolic processes involved in aerobic and anaerobic wastewater treatment systems.

Myth: Bioculture is ineffective for municipal solid waste management.

Fact: Bioculture can significantly aid in municipal solid waste management by accelerating the decomposition process of organic waste through microbial activity. When appropriately applied, bioculture can enhance composting and bioconversion processes, leading to faster waste degradation and reduced odors.

Myth: Bioculture is harmful to the environment.

Fact: Bioculture comprises naturally occurring microorganisms that are safe for the environment and human health when used as directed. These beneficial microorganisms help break down organic matter into harmless byproducts, contributing to the eco-friendly management of solid waste.

Myth: Bioculture is expensive and not cost-effective for solid waste management.

Fact: While there may be initial costs associated with acquiring bioculture products, their long-term benefits often outweigh the expenses. Bioculture can enhance the efficiency of waste management processes, leading to reduced processing times, lower landfill volumes, and decreased odors, ultimately resulting in cost savings for municipalities.

Myth: Bioculture requires specialized equipment and expertise to use.

Fact: Bioculture products are designed to be user-friendly and easy to apply, requiring minimal equipment and expertise. They can be incorporated into existing waste management systems without the need for significant modifications, making them accessible for municipalities of varying sizes and resources.

Myth: Bioculture is just a temporary fix for solid waste management issues.

Fact: Contrary to popular belief, bioculture offers a sustainable and long-lasting solution for solid waste management challenges. By harnessing the power of beneficial microorganisms, bioculture promotes natural decomposition processes, leading to lasting improvements in waste degradation and odor control.

Myth: BioRemeBioculture only works in controlled laboratory settings, not in real-world waste management scenarios.

Fact: BioReme Composting Culture is proven effective in real-world waste management environments, including landfills, composting facilities, and organic waste processing sites. Its versatile application methods and robust microbial formulations ensure reliable performance in diverse conditions, delivering tangible results for municipal solid waste management.

Myth: Bioculture is too complicated to integrate into existing waste management systems.

Fact: Integrating bioculture into existing waste management systems is straightforward and hassle-free. With user-friendly application methods and customizable formulations, bioculture seamlessly complements conventional waste treatment processes, enhancing efficiency and performance without requiring complex adjustments or specialized equipment.

Myth: BioReme is not suitable for large-scale waste management operations.

Fact: BioReme Composting microbes is equally effective for large-scale waste management operations, offering scalable solutions to meet the needs of municipalities and waste management facilities of all sizes. Whether treating small organic waste streams or managing vast landfill sites, BioReme Composting powder delivers consistent results and cost-effective benefits.

Myth: BioReme Composting Bacteria is just a trendy buzzword with no real benefits for solid waste management.

Fact: BioReme Bio-Culture is backed by decades of scientific research and practical application, demonstrating its tangible benefits for solid waste management. With proven effectiveness in accelerating waste decomposition, reducing odours, and minimizing environmental impact, bioculture is a valuable tool for sustainable waste management practices.

Myth: BioRemeBioculture is only suitable for industrial wastewater treatment, not for septic tanks.

Fact: Contrary to this misconception, BioRemeSeptic tank cleaner is specifically formulated to enhance the performance of septic tanks. Its powerful blend of beneficial microorganisms helps break down organic matter, grease, and solids in septic systems, leading to improved efficiency, reduced odors, and extended system lifespan.

Myth: Using BioRemeSeptic tank Microbes in septic tanks is complicated and requires professional assistance.

Fact: Applying BioReme Bacteria in septic tanks is simple and can be done by homeowners without professional assistance. The product also comes in easy-to-use formulations, such as water-soluble packets, making it convenient for regular maintenance and treatment of septic systems.

Myth: BioRemeSeptic tank powder is only effective for septic tanks that are already experiencing problems.

Fact: BioRemeSeptic tank Bioculture can be used preventatively to maintain septic tank health and prevent issues such as clogs, backups, and odours. Regular application of BioRemeBioculture helps maintain optimal microbial balance in the septic system, ensuring efficient waste digestion and preventing costly repairs.

Myth: BioRemeBioculture is expensive and not cost-effective for septic tank maintenance.

Fact: Investing in BioRemeBioculture for septic tank maintenance is a cost-effective solution compared to the expenses associated with septic tank repairs, replacements, and pumping. The product's affordable pricing and long-lasting benefits make it a wise choice for homeowners looking to ensure the proper functioning of their septic systems.

Myth: Higher microbial counts in bioculture always equate to better performance in wastewater treatment.

Fact: While microbial counts are important, the efficacy of a bioculture depends on the diversity and activity of the strains present, as well as their compatibility with the specific wastewater characteristics.

Myth: More strains in a bioculture formulation guarantee superior performance.

Fact: The selection of strains should prioritize quality over quantity. Too many strains may lead to competition for resources and limited efficacy, whereas a carefully selected group of compatible strains can work synergistically for optimal treatment.

Myth: Strains with higher growth rates are always preferable for bioculture formulations.

Fact: Growth rate is just one factor to consider. It's essential to choose strains with balanced growth characteristics and metabolic capabilities suitable for the targeted wastewater treatment application.

Myth: Commonly found strains are always the best choice for bioculture formulations.

Fact: While commonly found strains may be familiar, they may not always be the most effective for a specific wastewater treatment challenge. Targeted selection based on strain compatibility and performance in relevant conditions is crucial.Myth: More exotic or genetically modified strains are inherently better for bioculture formulations.

Myth: More exotic or genetically modified strains are inherently better for bioculture formulations.

Fact: Exotic or genetically modified strains may introduce regulatory, environmental, or safety concerns. Natural, non-GMO strains with proven efficacy and safety records are often preferred for bioculture formulations.